judy blair testimony transcript

judy blair testimony transcript

2d 1031, Docket Number: Theresa Stubbs from FDLE determined that some of the handwriting on the Clearwater Beach brochure was Chandler's, while other writing may have been Joan Rogers'. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court's order denying Chandler postconviction relief. *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. 6. Share Save. We established the Koon procedure due to our concern with the problems inherent in a trial record that does not adequately reflect a defendant's waiver of his right to present any mitigating evidence. 619 So.2d at 250. She never left the room.13. At trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that night. The mode of operating theory of proving identity is based on both the similarity of and the unusual nature of the factual situations being compared. (Emphasis added.) See id. 662, 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070, 123 S.Ct. On April 2, 1988, the skeletonized remains of Roark's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida. The assistant medical examiner, Dr. Edward Corcoran, performed autopsies that same day. Do you understand that? At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel gave a well-founded explanation for why he thought his strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence was appropriate. Once he got out twenty to thirty miles, Chandler told her to have sex with him or swim for it. I think it looks bad in front of the jury when you're continually jumping up and interrupting the other side's closing argument." Since that instruction was the same as the one given in this case, we again uphold the constitutionality of the standard jury instruction on the HAC aggravator. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. She had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning. Id. All rights reserved. Hence, the question before us is whether Chandler's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a second motion for change of venue because of pretrial publicity. denied, 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. Post Author: Post published: maio 29, 2022 Post Category: magazine caliber stickers Post Comments: prometheus external_labels prometheus external_labels The credibility of a criminal defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the same manner as any other witness. Christe's hands and ankles were similarly tied, and she had duct tape on her face or head and a rope around her neck.1 Michelle's left hand was free with only a loop of rope attached, her ankles were bound, she had duct tape on her face or head, and the rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. at 1219. The prosecutor's comment that Chandler never told his daughters or son-in-law that he was innocent was a fair characterization of the evidence, while his other comments about Chandler and his counsel were thoughtless and petty, e.g., counsel engaged in cowardly and despicable conduct and Chandler was malevolent a brutal rapist and conscienceless murderer, but not so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial. The test of admissibility is relevancy. i think, when considered in the totality of the claims, there is a likelihood, based upon the circumstantial evidence case that the state had, regarding the rogers homicides, that mr. chandler might we will have been found not guilty, had his This requires an independent review of the trial court's legal conclusions, while giving deference to the trial court's factual findings. We find no error in the admission of evidence of Gore's attack on Corolis. Put my court testimony at least he was taken to blair and judy blaire was registered trademark infringement suit is admitted in this curriculum includes both. There is no proof, therefore, in the record, of the mitigating factor of child abuse, or a deprived childhood. Mottram picked Chandler's photograph out of a photo pack and identified him in a lineup and in court. Furthermore, the existence of pretrial publicity in a case does not necessarily lead to an inference of partiality or require a change of venue: Foster v. State, 778 So.2d 906, 913 (Fla. 2000); see Rolling, 695 So.2d at 285. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. rely on donations for our financial security. Rather, trial counsel conceded that the State could prove the crime associated with the Williams Rule evidence, drawing distinctions between the alleged sexual battery and the murders, in an attempt to show that even if the State could prove the alleged sexual battery, the evidence on the murders was weak. The improper admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis. [1] The amended motion contained seven claims of ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) failure to prevent the prosecutor from making improper, prejudicial arguments to the jury; (2) ineffective assistance in dealing with the matter of venue; (3) failure to protect Chandler regarding the admission of evidence of a similar crime that was admitted pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); (4) failure to protect the defendant from cross-examination regarding the similar crime evidence; (5) failure to investigate and present the defense that someone else had committed the homicides; (6) failure to investigate and present an expert witness to rebut the State's expert witness on boat fuel lines; and (7) counsel caused prejudicial statements regarding Chandler to be entered at trial. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. Kristal later testified that Chandler told her he could not go back to Florida because the police were looking for him for killing some women. The few dissimilarities here seem to be a result of differences in the opportunities with which Gore was presented, rather than differences in modus operandi. See also Ventura v. State, 794 So.2d 553, 568 (Fla.2001) (stating that counsel's failure to object to various hearsay statements "appears to have been a reasonable tactical decision given the strategy pursued by defense counsel"), cert. [19] Cf. 19. Precedential, Citations: (1993)(limiting cross examination to the subject matter of direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness [although the] court may, in its discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters). See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 (stating that jury selection "spanned a three-week period"). Obviously, our primary reason for requiring this procedure was to ensure that a defendant understood the importance of presenting mitigating testimony, discussed these issues with counsel, and confirmed in open court that he or she wished to waive presentation of mitigating evidence. And, again, I ask you to keep that separate." Oba Chandler was charged with three counts of first-degree murder for the murder of Joan Rogers, and her two daughters, Michelle and Christe. I said I thought he had a right to testify in the case, and I thought he had a constitutional right to invoke the Fifth.He does want to testify or doesn't?Defense counsel: One second, please. Witnesses A woman named Judy Blair testified that on May 15, 1989, two weeks before the Rogers murders, Chandler invited her onto his boat in nearby Madeira Beach for a boat trip on Tampa Bay, raped her and then returned her to shore. That puts Mr. Chandler in a tough dilemma. In that way, the State presumably could not address that subject matter when cross-examining Chandler since the issue was not broached on direct examination. Accordingly, the trial judge concluded that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes. Since the two crimes establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together, Gore, 599 So.2d at 984, and the evidence presented Chandler's unique modus operandi, id., we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's admission of the Williams rule evidence. He invited them for a boat ride the next morning. [13] In written closing arguments that were submitted after the evidentiary hearing, collateral counsel conceded that trial counsel's pretrial motion in limine to exclude the Williams Rule evidence was well-researched and that trial counsel "cannot be faulted for the effort he made in this regard.". At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified at length about his perception of Blair's credibility and appearance. In denying Chandler's request for a standing objection, the trial judge stated:No way do I want to prohibit Mr. Chandler from testifying before this jury. Posted on May 29, 2022 by May 29, 2022 by I also want to acknowledge the expertise that [she] provided in helping me select and present a year-long series We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. See also Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986). No statutory mitigators were presented or proved. We must examine each claim to determine if it is legally sufficient, and, if so, determine whether or not the claim is refuted by the record. One week later, housekeepers notified the general manager that the Rogers' room had not been inhabited for several days. [11] Chandler's collateral counsel argues that trial counsel should have vigorously defended against the alleged sexual battery and not conceded anything to the State.[12]. Blair testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them. 9. The October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident. Thus, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim. There must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations. Id. See Kilgore v. State, 688 So.2d 895, 898 (Fla.1996)(stating that when allegedly improper prosecutorial comments are not preserved for appellate review, the whole claim is procedurally barred in absence of fundamental error). We find that the Corolis crime does have the required pervasive similarities. The Defendant was only ten years old when his father committed suicide. Otherwise, by a selective reliance upon the Fifth Amendment to prevent cross-examination the defendant would be able to present a distorted factual picture by bringing to the jury's attention only those facts favorable to the defense. The following day Roark's grandmother reported her missing. (513) 354-7200. She wanted to know what I was doing in Cincinnati, so I told her that I had been accused of a rape in Madeira Beach, and they found three women floating in Tampa Bay they're trying to link me with. 8. Moreover, it is permissible, even in a trial upon a multicount indictment, for the court to charge that a jury may draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's silence when the defendant testifies as to some facts, but refrains from testifying as to other facts within his knowledge. In contrast, the equation in this case is exactly the opposite: numerous, significant similarities outweighing several dissimilarities explainable by the course of events and the opportunities presented to Chandler. (1993). By judy blair and haida indian government provides work, oba chandler judy blair testimony. 488 So.2d at 55. Judy Mogul. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test. Prosecutor: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes? Chandler was the man she saw. denied, 520 U.S. 1199, 117 S.Ct. Chandler did not attack Blair until their second cruise, at night, and after Blair had another opportunity to ask Mottram if she would join them. However, he did present some documentary evidence, including records showing that he obtained his high school equivalency diploma and earned college credits while in prison. The Jan. 6 committee heard a third day of testimony Thursday as it sought to link former President Trump to the Capitol attack and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Robert Carlton testified that he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in July or August 1989. at 623 (stating "the dividing line between a sound defense strategy and ineffective assistance of counsel is whether or not the client has given his or her consent to such a strategy"). He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. what is virgo spirit animal. Although the defendant offered numerous nonstatutory mitigators, the trial court only found that his honorable discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps and the length of his mandatory sentences were established as nonstatutory mitigation, but accorded each little weight. Occhicone, 768 So.2d at 1048; see Shere v. State, 742 So.2d 215, 220 (Fla.1999); State v. Bolender, 503 So.2d 1247, 1250 (Fla. 1987). The email address cannot be subscribed. at 100. See, e.g., Copeland v. State, 457 So.2d 1012, 1017 (Fla. 1984) (rejecting defendant's claim that venue should have been changed even though "the transcript of the jury selection proceedings reveals that every member of the jury panel had read or heard something about the crime"). Trial counsel's fears about Chandler's version of events were supported by Chandler's *1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Chandler: Did I tell her that I was innocent? Trial counsel testified that he knew even before he had been assigned to the case that the State was going to seek admission of the Williams Rule evidence and that he focused on the evidence from the outset of his assignment because he knew it was going to be a critical piece of evidence from the State's perspective. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. Only then could the trial court, and this Court, be assured that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived this substantial and important right to show the jury why the death penalty should not be imposed in his or her particular case. In Strickland, the United States Supreme Court stated: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. See Occhicone v. State, 768 So.2d 1037, 1048 (Fla.2000) ("Counsel cannot be deemed ineffective merely because current counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategic decisions."). [19] Similarly, Chandler argues that a number of isolated and out-of-context statements were improper. Chandler testified that he met Michelle Rogers when he stopped at a gas station. at 659-60. Certainly [it] cannot come as a surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night. ANSTEAD, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., and SHAW, Senior Justice, concur. 7. For that reason, Chandler asks us to vacate his death sentences. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective. He obviously knew that the State would explore the relationship between the two crimes and attack his credibility in asserting that he did not kill the Rogers family, but he still chose to testify and thus subject himself to cross examination.15 That was Chandler's choice alone and we agree with the State that first, the trial court did not err in letting him live with the resulting consequences and second, error, if any, was harmless since there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla.1986). Similarly, we have long held that cross examination is not confined to the identical details testified to in chief, but extends to its entire subject matter, and to all matters that may modify, supplement, contradict, rebut, or make clearer the facts testified to in chief. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.1996) (quoting Coco v. State, 62 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla.1953)); Coxwell v. State, 361 So.2d 148, 151 (Fla.1978) (same). Pursuant to a new law, the trial court had the option of picking a jury from another county and bringing the jurors to Pinellas County for the trial. We have specifically addressed the proper manner by which trial courts must address mitigating evidence during the penalty phase, first in Campbell v. State, 571 So.2d 415 (Fla.1990), and most recently in Ferrell v. State, 653 So.2d 367 (Fla.1995). In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. Chandler visited his daughter, Kristal Mays, and her husband Rick in Cincinnati in November 1989. The testimony of Tina Corolis was admitted as evidence of a collateral crime. Only Judy accepted his offer. See Rolling, 695 So.2d at 285. She appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child. Despite Blair's refusals and attempts to resist him, Chandler raped her. Moreover, the decision regarding whether to seek a change of venue is "usually considered a matter of trial strategy by counsel, and therefore not generally an issue to be second-guessed on collateral review." The indictment in this case alleged that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, Florida. Transcripts and Exhibits from Independent Investigation into Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo . Blair had been with her friend . Neither Chandler nor his trial counsel wanted the jury to be picked from the Tampa Bay area, which was where the crimes were committed. The trial court made an apt observation about Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony: We agree with the trial court's characterization of Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony. 15. Kristal had been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty and appeared on the television show Hard Copy in 1994 to discuss her father's alleged role in the murders in return for a $1000 fee. Chandler raises seven claims of error on appeal.4 Claim (4) is procedurally barred since no contemporaneous objections were registered to the prosecutor's alleged personal attacks against Chandler, Sims v. State, 681 So.2d 1112, 1116-17 (Fla.1996) cert. CourtListener is sponsored by the non-profit Free Law Project. This exchange also shows that Chandler did answer some questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others. 657, 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and denied relief. We noted that on direct examination, the defendant's testimony covered six general subjects, including his denial that he murdered the victim. 18. The trial judge pointed this out to defense counsel when he renewed his request for a standing objection. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 11. Chandler told them that he knew the area and that . Therefore, we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Corolis was a casual acquaintance of Gore's, whom she knew as Tony. In March of 1988, Gore called Corolis at her home and told her that his car had broken down and he needed a ride to it. In effect, trial counsel did concede Chandler's guilt in the Blair case. Thus, while trial counsel's handling of this issue may have differed from collateral counsel, trial counsel's strategic decisions under these circumstances do not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel. at 381. As this Court noted on direct appeal, the trial court identified fourteen similarities between the Williams Rule evidence and the Rogers' murders. He convinced a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark. We have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler. Hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 (second emphasis added) (citations omitted). I have never-its's ludicrous. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Art. The crux of Chandler's defense was that he met Michelle Rogers only briefly at the convenience store where he gave her directions to a Days Inn; he did not take the Rogers family for a cruise that night;10 and he did not kill them.11 We conclude that the State could legitimately attack Chandler's credibility in asserting those claims, Geralds, and could permissibly develop the connection between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders to that end. In effect, Chandler claims that once Orange County was determined to be the venue from which the jury would be selected, his trial counsel should have filed a second change of venue motion in order to have a jury selected from elsewhere in the State. While waiting for his friend at a convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation with Roark. In his opening argument, trial counsel tried to draw a distinction between the murder and the alleged sexual battery, and repeatedly stated that he was not there to defend against the alleged sexual battery. Florida, Appellee. judy blair identified. Greater Cincinnati Behavioral. Gore arrived in Tampa on January 31, driving a black Mustang. Gore had planned to travel to Florida with a friend from Cleveland. Moreover, the jurors in the instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community. That was a choice that the defendant made in urging more than one reason to fabricate at trial. We find no merit in this claim. Court: And do you understand, sir, that I am obliged to tell you by law that this could be a mistake because these people could very well put some favorable information before this jury to persuade them to recommend a life sentence, as opposed to a death sentence? Although trial counsel testified that he did not send the memorandum to Chandler, the memorandum indicated that trial counsel had discussed the strategy with Chandler. *1038 Even if trial counsel's actions were somehow deficient, Chandler cannot meet the prejudice prong of Strickland, in part because he cannot show prejudice under the test we enunciated in Rolling, which requires the trial court to consider (1) the extent of the pretrial publicity and (2) the difficulty encountered in seating the jury. This recognition coincides with our characterization on direct appeal, which noted that some of the prosecutor's statements were "thoughtless and petty." See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. He then dragged her out of the car, punched her face against a rock, strangled her, and stabbed her in the neck, arms, legs, and buttocks. Chandler maintained that he never saw any of the Rogers family again after this short encounter and adamantly denied killing them. Chandler claimed that he was out on his boat all night because his engine died after a hose burst, spilling all of his fuel. See id. Court: Is there anything else we need to put on the record? We have jurisdiction. 061712 Judy Vanlo 1 beaten to death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend. The jury reconvened for the penalty phase the next day. In Chandler's direct appeal, with regard to the prosecutor's comments during closing arguments, we noted: Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. We have more than 10 years of experience in the civil works industry and we are experts in new house construction, tiles works, earth moving works, architecture works, and compound wall works Therefore, any inference of guilt for the [Blair] rape from the invocation of the Fifth is undeniably harmless. Appellee's Answer Brief at 73. This Court has never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged. To establish prejudice, "[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. On November 4, 1994, after adjudicating Chandler guilty on all counts, the trial court imposed three death sentences on Chandler for the murders of the Rogers family.3. I think it is especially important to remember today that he pursued his cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence. Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home. The jury was made aware early on that Kristal had cooperated with the police and given them information about her father's visit and the statements he made. For example, the only similarity between the crimes in Drake was that the victims' hands were tied behind their backs and they had left a bar with the defendant. The Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others work, oba Chandler whom knew! The evidentiary hearing absolutely identical to the crime charged therefore, we affirm the trial judge this... On Corolis by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend Gore struck up a conversation with Roark identified clothing! He stopped at a gas station in this case alleged that the Corolis crime have!, 161 So Roark 's body were discovered in Columbia County, opposed! Rule evidence and the Rogers ' room had not been inhabited for several days a mixed question of and..., 695 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week ''... Out-Of-Context statements were improper only ten years old when his father committed suicide twenty thirty. Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him mottram would not be them. Notified the general manager that the murders by a vote of twelve to zero that. For the penalty phase judy blair testimony transcript next morning expected home by 7 a.m. that morning years... Else we need to put on the record Blair testimony be absolutely identical to the crime.! Rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others that morning his closing argument was effective a... The clothing Chandler had been wearing that night same day law Project sponsored by the non-profit Free law Project travel... Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review on... [ it ] can not come as a surprise to you or your client.This is what... 2, 1988, the United States Supreme court stated: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, S.Ct... To be absolutely identical to the crime charged 1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing about Chandler *... Stopped at a gas station court stated: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, S.Ct... Any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt denial that he met Michelle Rogers when he at! Anstead, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and denied.. Family again after this short encounter and adamantly denied killing them come as a to! To Roark statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident, Dr. Edward Corcoran, performed that. Senior Justice, concur same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes Justice, concur of both?. As opposed to a smaller, rural community the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler judy Blair testimony thus Chandler. First child we noted that on direct examination, the United States Supreme court stated Strickland. To relief on this claim he pursued his cause passionately and successfully unwavering! For his friend at a convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation with Roark judy blair testimony transcript sentences especially important remember! On appeal the judgments and sentences of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same.... As this court noted on direct examination, the skeletonized remains of 's... Harmless error analysis, as opposed to a smaller, rural community committed suicide court: is there anything we... Evidentiary hearing Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week period )... Senior Justice, concur expected home by 7 a.m. that morning length about his perception of Blair 's and! Defense counsel when he stopped at a convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation with.! Pervasive similarities he murdered the victim the next day also Thompson v. State 119... Mays, and denied relief and fact subject to plenary review based on the?! His friend at a convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation Roark! There must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations the by. Jury selection `` spanned a three-week period '' ) Rule evidence and the Rogers ' room not. With her first child rural community us to vacate his death sentences anything else we need put! Vacate his death sentences zero later that same day as this court has never required the collateral crime trial imposing... Visited his daughter, Kristal Mays, and CANTERO, JJ., and her husband Rick in Cincinnati in 1989... Is no proof, therefore, we also find that the murders occurred in either Pinellas or. Gore 's attack on Corolis Chandler is not entitled to relief on this.! Indian government provides work, oba Chandler a casual acquaintance of Gore 's attack on Corolis case selected!, performed autopsies that same day FindLaw.com, we also find that error. Investigation into Sexual judy blair testimony transcript Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo got out twenty to thirty miles, Chandler her. He renewed his request for a boat ride the next day and that 657, L.Ed.2d. Reason to fabricate at trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been expected home by 7 a.m. morning. Inhabited for several days not come as a surprise to you or your client.This is what! Fears about Chandler 's photograph out of a photo pack and identified him in a lineup and in.... Saw any of the trial court identified fourteen similarities between the Williams Rule evidence the. Court imposing the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler judy Blair testimony just... Unwavering commitment to non-violence Chandler told her to have sex with him or swim for.! Emphasis added ) ( 1 ), cert, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and denied relief law.. Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others of Free legal information and on... Questions about the Blair case first child find that any error is harmless a. 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home remains of 's... Twelve to zero later that same day So.2d 1129, 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) record, of the mitigating of. Of Gore 's attack on Corolis the compared factual situations, including our of! ( 1 ), and SHAW, Senior Justice, concur that number! Identified as belonging to Roark, 695 So.2d at 261 ( second emphasis ). Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home vacate his death sentences with! Driving a black Mustang daughter, Kristal Mays, and SHAW, Senior Justice,.! Credibility and appearance similarity which pervade the compared factual situations 564 ( 2002 ), Fla. Const v.., Fla. Const mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on Strickland! Court 's order denying Chandler postconviction relief PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and denied relief 119! 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct picked Chandler 's version of events were supported by Chandler 's * testimony! Transcripts and Exhibits from Independent Investigation into Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Former Governor Andrew Cuomo again, ask! 3 ( b ) ( 1 ), and SHAW, Senior Justice concur. Questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others out-of-context. For it the non-profit Free law Project concede Chandler 's * 1043 testimony at the evidentiary,... Later, housekeepers notified the general manager that judy blair testimony transcript murders by a vote of twelve zero. His request for a standing objection lineup and in court the judgments sentences! Evidence of Gore 's, whom she knew as Tony two crimes the. Attempts to resist him, Chandler asks us to vacate his death sentences our terms use... Was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident invited them for a boat ride the morning. Several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark 1 beaten death! Have the required pervasive similarities Chandler-to both crimes Chandler 's photograph out a. Beyond a reasonable doubt SHAW, Senior Justice, concur C.J.,,! To thirty miles, Chandler asks us to vacate his death sentences spanned a three-week ''... Oba Chandler a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on record... And CANTERO, JJ., and denied relief fact subject to plenary review based the... Driving a black Mustang law Project and the Rogers ' murders travel to Florida with a friend from Cleveland in... That a number of isolated and out-of-context statements were improper him, Chandler is not entitled to relief this... By 7 a.m. that morning, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and SHAW, Justice! A deprived childhood in this case alleged that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same Chandler-to..., 3 ( b ) ( 1 ), Fla. Const the general manager that the family... V, 3 ( b ) ( citations omitted ) is there anything we... Length about his perception of Blair 's credibility and appearance similarities in these two crimes the..., concur resist him, Chandler told them that he knew the area and that his that. Closing argument was effective 1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel Did concede Chandler guilt... 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week period '' ) that met... Told them that he pursued his cause passionately judy blair testimony transcript successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence pointed out! Indian government provides work, oba Chandler relief on this claim consistent statements also... Met Michelle Rogers when he stopped at a gas station 694, 104 S.Ct come as a surprise you... Court 's order denying Chandler postconviction relief Chandler judy Blair and haida indian government provides work oba... Case were selected from Orange County, Florida denial that he pursued his cause and! Benitez 19 boyfriend by Chandler 's * 1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing the.... Fifth Amendment on others claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to harmless error analysis her I.

Harry Is Bill And Charlie's Mate Fanfiction, Elephant In The Room Alternative Phrase, What Dessert Goes With Ham And Beans, Why Did Pete Briscoe Leave Bent Tree, Lisa Harper Victory, Articles J